Daniel Scott
@dan
After more than 15 years as a graphic designer and with significant time as an Adobe instructor under my belt (at one point, I believe I was the most certified Adobe instructor in the world), I've been watching the design software landscape evolve dramatically.
People constantly ask me, "Dan, what about this other software? Is it better? Is it worse? Should I switch?" Over the years, I've made it my mission to roll up my sleeves and explore these alternative products to see if they're worth switching to and if the industry is heading in that direction.
In this post, I'll compare Adobe's heavy hitters against their challengers to help you decide if Adobe still wears the design software crown in 2025.
Is Photoshop still the industry standard software for image editing?
Strengths:
Amazing at the hard stuff - photo compositing and retouching
Great interoperability across all Adobe apps
AI that's commercially safe (a big perk for client work)
Still the industry standard when looking for work
Canva is a versatile, intuitive, and rapidly expanding opponent. Can it reach the throne?
Canva isn't a complete direct replacement for Photoshop, but people are using it for Photoshop-style tasks.
Strengths:
Really easy to learn and use
Free or cheap to use
Comes preloaded with good-looking templates
Strong brand kit functionality
Versatility - does some Photoshop stuff, but also some video editing, print work, and web stuff
Weaknesses:
Only does simple photo editing
Limited to one-click selection (no refining options)
Simplified layer system - more like "boxes of content" than Photoshop's complex layering
Would I switch to Canva? If you're primarily focused on social media and working with stock images and text, 100% yes! As a freelancer or business owner primarily doing digital and online work, I'd also be happy to switch. But as a professional designer working on complex compositing projects, no - Photoshop has the depth and breadth needed for serious work, especially when clients need commercially safe AI tools.
Affinity Photo is also a powerful image editing tool, but can it reach the finish line first?
Unlike Canva, Affinity Photo is a direct Photoshop competitor trying to do the same job.
Strengths:
One-off cost of $70 - buy it and own it forever
Easier to learn than Photoshop (they've kept only the most-used features)
Very similar to Photoshop in UI and architecture, making it easy to switch
Weaknesses:
AI selection tools aren't as advanced as Photoshop's
Missing that crucial 20% of specialized features professionals often need
Would I switch to Affinity Photo? As a professional designer, I can't - I need all the bells and whistles. But if you're using Photoshop alongside other tools in your workflow, you could totally switch, as Affinity Photo covers about 80% of what most people do.
Adobe Illustrator is widely a first choice for professional vector designers.
Strengths:
Amazing typography controls
Killer at prepress work (fold marks, crop marks, CMYK color separation)
The Shape Builder tool is a game-changer for combining shapes
Industry standard for professional vector work
Weaknesses:
Intimidating interface for beginners
Affinity Designer, like Photo, is a powerful solution for graphic design, with a fair price.
Strengths:
Looks and feels like Illustrator but focuses on the 80% most people use
Excellent vector and pixel workflow integration
One-time $70 purchase (or bundle with Affinity Photo and Publisher for $180)
Would I switch to Affinity Designer? If you're a casual user or just getting started, either option would work well. As a professional doing general vector drawing, I could switch too. But for complex pre-press work or freelancers seeking agency jobs, you'll still need Illustrator.
Corel Draw is a classic and offers a simplified, user-friendly interface.
Strengths:
Slightly simpler interface than Illustrator
Superior pre-press capabilities (even better than Illustrator for commercial print work)
Weaknesses:
Expensive at $270/year or $550 one-time purchase
Less automated features than Illustrator
Would I switch to CorelDRAW? If you're a logo designer or freelance illustrator, you could be happy with CorelDRAW, but there are probably features that would keep you in Illustrator. Small business owners should look at Canva or Adobe Express instead. The one area I'd definitely switch is for pre-press work in industrial printing settings.
Figma smashes in the user interface design industry! Can Adobe win this round?
Figma is primarily a UX design tool, but people are increasingly using it like Illustrator, making it impossible to ignore as a competitor.
Strengths:
Super easy pen tool (much easier than other vector programs)
Great for digital ads, YouTube thumbnails, website graphics, hero graphics
Streamlines workflow by eliminating the Illustrator-to-Figma step
Weaknesses:
Completely lacks pre-press capabilities
Would I switch to Figma? For logo design, freelance graphic design, or small business ownership - 100% no. But if you do any UX design work, absolutely yes! Figma is far better than Illustrator for UI/UX design now. Personally, I need both - Illustrator for complex logos and icons, Figma for simpler stuff and UI work.
InDesign is still a remarkable desktop publishing app. A crown jewel, perhaps?
Strengths:
Very complex typography controls
Excellent digital publishing formats
Strong automation and database connectivity
Perfect for large, complex documents (catalogs, manuals, books)
Weaknesses:
Like other Adobe products, the accumulation of features makes it intimidating for beginners
Can Affinity Publisher win the race against Adobe InDesign? Will we need to check the photo-finish?
Strengths:
More approachable interface (without decades of feature accumulation)
One-time purchase
Weaknesses:
Limited digital publishing and interactive PDF capabilities
No grid styles or data merge functionality
Would I switch to Affinity Publisher? For casual users or designers making newsletters, annual reports, or similar documents, Affinity Publisher works great. But for larger documents with complex database connections, InDesign still wins.
This is a gem for vintage designers, like me! Can QuarkXPress challenge the crown?
The original desktop publishing software that InDesign eventually displaced.
Strengths:
Excellent with complex documents
Strong dynamic content features (databases, libraries, real-time updates)
Weaknesses:
Expensive at $220/year
Tricky user interface
Being left behind in the industry
Would I switch to QuarkXPress? As a freelancer or casual user, definitely not - it's too complex and expensive for occasional use. As a professional designer, it's still a no - InDesign has comparable or better features and much wider industry adoption. But if you end up at a job that uses QuarkXPress, it's totally capable software.
When it comes to desktop publishing, it's basically InDesign or nothing for most people.
Formerly known as Spark, can Adobe Express establish itself as an industry standard?
Strengths:
Relatively affordable ($9.95/month)
Great connectivity with other Adobe tools
Strong AI tools
Excellent brand asset management
Good basic publishing capabilities
Once again, Canva deserves a shot at the title, for its versatility and workflow boosters!
Strengths:
Very similar feature set to Adobe Express
Widespread adoption and familiarity
Would I switch between these? It honestly doesn't matter - they do basically the same job. I use Canva simply because it's more popular, and I'm more likely to find clients who already know how to use it.
As a professional designer, these tools are invaluable for client relationships. I can set everything up professionally, then empower clients to make their own simple updates without calling me every week for minor text changes. It makes my life easier and lets me take on projects I might otherwise turn down.
Adobe has completely lost its position in UX design. Remember Adobe XD? They had it, it was pretty good, and they were competing with Figma, Invision, Sketch, and others. Then Adobe decided to discontinue XD because they planned to buy Figma for $20 billion. When that acquisition was blocked on antitrust grounds, Adobe was left with nothing.
If you're looking for a UX design tool in 2025, there's basically only one choice - Figma. Sketch is fine, but Figma dominates the market now.
Adobe's biggest advantage is its ecosystem. While individual competitors may match or even exceed specific Adobe products, none offer the comprehensive toolset that Creative Cloud provides. For someone like me who works across many different projects and needs Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, plus video and 3D tools, Creative Cloud delivers tremendous value through connectivity and integration.
Yes, Adobe's pricing is a pain point for many. But as a professional, I look at what I need to do my job: myself, coffee, a laptop, and Adobe software. Considering what I get from Adobe and the value I can create with it, I feel I'm getting a good bargain.
The verdict? If you're a casual user utilizing small parts of Creative Suite, look for cheaper alternatives that meet your specific needs. But for professional designers juggling diverse projects and needing that full toolkit, Adobe still wears the crown in 2025.
Looking to learn more about the software I’ve mentioned in this blog post? When you become a BYOL member, you gain access to my 30+ courses on Illustrator, Photoshop, Lightroom, InDesign, Figma, and more. As a BYOL member you will also enjoy personalized support, earn certificates, and tackle exciting community challenges. Head here to sign-up!